Identifying social determinants of health from clinical narratives: A study of performance, documentation ratio, and potential bias.

TitleIdentifying social determinants of health from clinical narratives: A study of performance, documentation ratio, and potential bias.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsYu Z, Peng C, Yang X, Dang C, Adekkanattu P, Patra BGopal, Peng Y, Pathak J, Wilson DL, Chang C-Y, Lo-Ciganic W-H, George TJ, Hogan WR, Guo Y, Bian J, Wu Y
JournalJ Biomed Inform
Volume153
Pagination104642
Date Published2024 May
ISSN1532-0480
KeywordsBias, Data Mining, Documentation, Electronic Health Records, Female, Humans, Male, Narration, Natural Language Processing, Social Determinants of Health
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a natural language processing (NLP) package to extract social determinants of health (SDoH) from clinical narratives, examine the bias among race and gender groups, test the generalizability of extracting SDoH for different disease groups, and examine population-level extraction ratio.

METHODS: We developed SDoH corpora using clinical notes identified at the University of Florida (UF) Health. We systematically compared 7 transformer-based large language models (LLMs) and developed an open-source package - SODA (i.e., SOcial DeterminAnts) to facilitate SDoH extraction from clinical narratives. We examined the performance and potential bias of SODA for different race and gender groups, tested the generalizability of SODA using two disease domains including cancer and opioid use, and explored strategies for improvement. We applied SODA to extract 19 categories of SDoH from the breast (n = 7,971), lung (n = 11,804), and colorectal cancer (n = 6,240) cohorts to assess patient-level extraction ratio and examine the differences among race and gender groups.

RESULTS: We developed an SDoH corpus using 629 clinical notes of cancer patients with annotations of 13,193 SDoH concepts/attributes from 19 categories of SDoH, and another cross-disease validation corpus using 200 notes from opioid use patients with 4,342 SDoH concepts/attributes. We compared 7 transformer models and the GatorTron model achieved the best mean average strict/lenient F1 scores of 0.9122 and 0.9367 for SDoH concept extraction and 0.9584 and 0.9593 for linking attributes to SDoH concepts. There is a small performance gap (∼4%) between Males and Females, but a large performance gap (>16 %) among race groups. The performance dropped when we applied the cancer SDoH model to the opioid cohort; fine-tuning using a smaller opioid SDoH corpus improved the performance. The extraction ratio varied in the three cancer cohorts, in which 10 SDoH could be extracted from over 70 % of cancer patients, but 9 SDoH could be extracted from less than 70 % of cancer patients. Individuals from the White and Black groups have a higher extraction ratio than other minority race groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Our SODA package achieved good performance in extracting 19 categories of SDoH from clinical narratives. The SODA package with pre-trained transformer models is available at https://github.com/uf-hobi-informatics-lab/SODA_Docker.

DOI10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104642
Alternate JournalJ Biomed Inform
PubMed ID38621641
PubMed Central IDPMC11141428
Grant ListR21 MH129682 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R56 AG069880 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
U18 DP006512 / DP / NCCDPHP CDC HHS / United States
R00 LM013001 / LM / NLM NIH HHS / United States
R01 MH121907 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R01 HL169277 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG080624 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01 AI172875 / AI / NIAID NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG080991 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA246418 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U18DP006512 / ACL / ACL HHS / United States
R21 CA253394 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R21 CA245858 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
R01 DA050676 / DA / NIDA NIH HHS / United States
R21 AG068717 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States